Pemberian Nafkah Iddah Cerai Gugat Menurut Mazhab Syafi’i (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 137/K/Ag/2007)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59342/jl.v1i1.32Keywords:
Divorce, Islamic Family Law, Positive Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 137/K/Ag/2007Abstract
In the decision of the divorce case, the judge in the Religious Court requires a husband to pay the 'iddah of his ex-wife. As for the case for divorce (khulu ') in the Shafi'i school, it does not provide iddah for ex-wife. A wife who demands a divorce from her husband can abort her rights in the future, such as the right to a living during the 'iddah period and a mut'ah income. However, in the divorce decision at the Supreme Court regarding the divorce case, the judge gave a decision by granting the divorce lawsuit by charging the 'iddah cost of living to the husband. A lawsuit (khulu') is a divorce that occurs at the request of the wife by giving a ransom or 'iwadl to and with the approval of her husband. In this study, the subject of discussion is how the wife's 'iddah' livelihood rights after divorcing her husband according to the Syafi'i school? 137/K/AG/2007?, and Is the judge's consideration allowing the wife as the plaintiff to get the 'iddah maintenance right from her husband after the divorce? This research is the result of library research which is descriptive and analytical. The results of the research obtained are firstly, according to the Syafi'i school, the 'iddah income is not given to the ex-wife who divorced ba'in such as divorce (khulu') which is also categorized as talak ba'in sughra, secondly. 137/K/AG/2007 concerning the provision of a living 'iddah divorce, the panel of judges continues to provide a living 'iddah to the wife because the wife is not proven to have committed nusyuz, the three Supreme Court Judges' considerations regarding the 'iddah divorce claim are based on Article 41 letter (c) of the Law -Law No.1 of 1974 Jo, and Article 149 of the Compilation of Islamic Law.
References
Al-Harari , Abdullah bin Bin Muhammad Asy-syaibi al-Abdari, Umdah ar-Raghib fi Mukhtashar Bughyatul ath-Thalib, Beirut: Syarikah Dar al Masyari’, 2004
Audah Abd Qadir, Tasri’ al-Jinai a-Islamiy, Juz I, Cairo: Dar Hadits, 2009
Abu Zaid,Farouq, al-Syari’ah al-Islamiyyah bayn al-Muhafizhin wa al-Mujadidin, Terjemah Husein Muhammad, Hukum Islam antara Tradisionalis dan Modernis, Jakarta: P3M, 1989.
al-Ghazi, Muhammad Abi Qasim, Fathul Qarib Mujib, Jakarta : Dar Qutub al-Islamiyyah, 2003
Aziz Zainuddin Abdul al-Maliabari, Fathul Mu’in bi Syarh Quratul ‘Ain, Indonesia: Haramain, 2006.
Auda, Jasser, Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Phylosophy Of Islamic Law a Systems Approach terjemah Reformasi Hukum Islam Berdasarkan Filsafat Makasid Syariah pendekatan sistem, Medan:La Tansa Press, 2014.
Amir, Abdul Azis, Ta’zir al-Syari’at al-Islam, Beirut, Daar al-Fikr Arabi, 1969
al-Mawardi Abu Hasan, al- Ahkam al-Shulthaniah wa al-Wilayah al-Diniyah, Indonesia : Haramain, 2015.
al-Hadrami, Salim Ibn Samir, Safinah An-Najat, Indonesia: Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-Arabbiyah, Bastiat, Fredict, Hukum, Jakarta, Freedom Institute, 2010
Bello, Petrus C.K.L., Ideologi Hukum, Bogor. Insan Merdeka, 2013
Departemen Agama RI, Al-Quran dan Terjemahnya, Bandung: Sygma exagrafika, 2009
Djazuli, A., Kaidah-kaidah Fikih, Kencana, Jakarta, 2017
Efendi Jonaedi dan Gunadi Ismu,Cepatdan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada media Group, 2014.
Fatwa MUI No.3 Tahun 2004 tentang terorisme
Ibnu Hajar al-Asqalani, Surabaya, Bulughul Maram terjmahan, Mutiara Ilmu, 2012. Jalaluddin Muhammad Ibn Ahmad al-Mahalli dan Jalalaluddin Abdurrahman Ibn Abi Bakr Al-
Suyuthi, Surabaya, Tafsir Jalalain, Juz I, Dar al-Abidin, tt.
Loqman, Loebby, Analisis Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan Kejahatan terhadap Keamanan Negara di Indonesia, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 1990
Muslich, Ahmad Wardi, Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016 Makassary, Ridwan al-, Terorisme Berjubah Agama, Jakarta: PBB UIN, 2003.
Munajat, Makhrus, Transformasi Hukum Pidana Islam dalam Konteks ke Indonesiaan, Yogyakarta: Ujung Pena, 2011
Muladi, Hakikat Terorisme dan Beberapa Prinsip Pengaturan dalam Kriminalisasi, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia FISIP UI, vol 2 no III, Desember 2002.
Muhammad Mustofa, Memahami Terorisme: Suatu Perspektif Kriminologi, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia FISIP UI, vol 2 no III, Desember 2002.
Munawwir, Ahmad Warsan, Surabaya, al-Munawwir: Kamus Arab-Indonesia, Pustaka Progresif, 1997.
Muhammad Ali al-Shabuni, Beirut, Mukhtashar Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Juz I, Dar al-Qur’an al-
Karim, 1402 H
Muhammad Ali Ash-Shabununi, Kairo, Terjemah Tafsir Ayatul Ahkam minal Qur’an jilid II, Darul Alamiah, 2014
Prasetyo, Teguh, Hukum Pidana, Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2017
Renggong, Ruslan, Hukum Pidana Khusus: Memahami Delik-Delik di Luar KUHP, Jakarta: Kencana, 2016
Shihab, Quraish, Tafsir Al-Misbah jilid 3, Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2009. Sudarto, Hukum Pidana I, Yayasan Sudarto dan UNDIP, Semarang, 2009 Undang-Undang No. 15 Tahun 2003 Tentang Anti Terorisme
Zainal, Eldin H., Hukum Pidana Islam Sebuah Perbandingan (al- Muqarranah al- Mazahib fi al-Jinayah), Bandung: Cipta Pustaka Media Perintis, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Landraad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.